|Ratios are pitiful|
|Tuesday, 24 April 2012 08:09 | Print page:|
VICTORIANS would no doubt have been as appalled as I was on reading in an April seniors magazine that one staff member had been on duty overnight to care for 50 aged residents in a residential facility.
Such a ratio is not surprising, however, given the paucity of the legislation regarding staffing requirements - approximately 4 lines - in the 379-page Aged Care Act (1997). And although aged care received a brief appearance on the front pages this weekend, the quality of care is unlikely to change dramatically while providers and the Productivity Commission view ratios as unnecessary and a ''blunt instrument''.
This is astounding, given that a recent report commissioned by the Department of Health and Ageing found the system to be lacking with regard to the delivery of high-quality residential care for dementia sufferers, with ''1600 new cases being diagnosed every week and [its prevalence] likely to double over the next 20 years.''
While providers have licence to employ minimal numbers of registered nurses and a majority of minimally trained personal care workers - at such pitiful ratios to residents - it is little wonder that the prospect of entering residential aged care is viewed so negatively.
Glenda Addicott, East Ringwood
We welcome your comments on this article. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification.