contact us

We invite you to contribute and debate aged care - not by complaining, but by coming up with solutions. Each contribution will be publicly available (unless confidentiality is requested) and comment on it will be encouraged.  If you wish to discuss the confidentiality of your submission prior to lodging it, please contact us.

For tips on making a contribution, please view our Join the Conversation web page.
You can also download our docxContribution template28.45 KB.

  1. Contributions: submit your contribution using the form below. We accept electronic formats in either Microsoft Word or Open Office document formats (MAC or Windows platforms acceptable).
  2. Short comments:  you can fill out the 'Add A Comment' form at the base of relevant pages.
  3. If you would like to discuss your experience please use the add a comment on the Contributions page.

Contribution guidelines: We reserve the right to edit out any inappropriate or defamatory comment or reject the submission on these grounds or if it is frivolous and unhelpful. Accepted feedback and contributions will be published in the Contributions section. If you would like all or part of your submission to be made confidential, please indicate when making your submission, as well as providing some detail within your contribution.

Please refer to our website terms and conditions for publishing of information and site use.

Make a contribution:


In the spirit of transparency and open public debate, Aged Care Crisis encourages authors to make their contributions public. We also acknowledge that there may be circumstances where some authors may wish part or all of their contributions to be confidential. For example, some family members or staff working in the sector may wish to partake in the public debate around aged care, but would like to request anonymity. ACC will consider these requests and ask that you contact us prior to making a contribution.

Public: your contribution may be published and comment invited

Partially confidential: your contribution may be published but all identifying details (including your name) will be withheld. Your contribution may be referred to and comment invited, but no identifying information will be disclosed.


Allowed file types: doc, docx, rtf, odf (Windows or Mac format)

Maximum file size limit: 3mb

captcha

Note:

  • Where possible, contributions will be converted to HTML (or pdf format) and published in the contributions section, where everyone will be able to see and comment on what is being said.
  • Contributions can contain links to material on your own or other websites, but not to advertisements advertising your services or products unless they are supplying information relevant to the debate.
  • Comments are page specific, and will be placed at the base of each page where others can view or respond. Commenters can subscribe to any follow-up comments. (*As comments are short, it may be more constructive to provide feedback using the form, below).

 

Comments  

#3 Amanda 2019-11-05 22:34
Continual injections of funding by the government into aged care “businesses” is not the answer. Greedy owners just pocket the funds and the status quo remains. The meals remain poor, the staffing doesn’t change and residents care remains questionable.

Skills mix and contact hours are still limited by greedy owners and no staff to patient ratios which force already pushed staff to sometimes try to “care” for fifteen residents plus. Is there any wonder residents don’t get adequate fluids, activity and hygiene and are often dumped in front of TV all the day?

Government needs to provide money which is only spent on care. Monies for nutrition and monies for allied health. This happened years ago where funds not spent on the areas were withdrawn the following year by the government. Hence there were registered nurses and plenty of physios, activities workers and better meals.

This all became too hard for the government and they changed from the old funding model?? “Cam/ Sam??? To just these massive pots of money being thrown at providers. They in turn make their homes look amazing so prospective clients are blinded by luxury but cannot see there is no substance or that the homes are poorly staffed.

Earlier this year in an interview on the 7.30 report with a aged home provider the home acknowledged that they made $600,000,000 dollars and received $500,000,000 dollars from the government but of the 160 homes this conglomerate had 93 homes with sanctions????
How can this be?

Home care providers cry poor and demand more funding whilst blaming nurses for unfair treatment of their residents, these same providers are banking billions and residents are being fed party pies. It just doesn’t equate.

Go back and watch where the funds are being spent, make the “bastards” accountable and then we may get somewhere.
Quote
#2 Helen Hackett 2017-04-23 16:50
I would like to be informed if any of the Aged Care Commission findings are to be used in a publication. I do have the conclusive findings by the Aged Care Commissioner.
Quote
#1 SickAndTired 2016-11-02 11:41
Most Aged Care Places In Victoria are run by greedy Owners that do not care for the care needs of their Residents at all. The Aged Care workers (Not the Registered Nurses) are treated poorly, bullied by Facility Managers and Registered Nurses. Most of it takes place at (names removed). Their bullying policies are of no use!
Quote